We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Spontaneous Human Combustion?

By R. Kayne
Updated May 16, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGEEK is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At DelightedCooking, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Spontaneous human combustion (SHC) refers to the proposed ability of the human body to burst into flames without an external source of ignition. It is a controversial idea that has no known scientific foundation, yet it appears to occur on rare occasions.

Death by alleged spontaneous human combustion has three main characteristics that differentiate it from other types of death by fire:

  • Victims of proposed spontaneous human combustion incinerate so completely, even the skeleton is reduced to ashes. This does not even occur in a crematorium, where sustained temperatures of 1,300-1,800° Fahrenheit (700-1000° Celsius) leave bones that must be pulverized in a separate process, then remixed with soft-body ashes. House fires also do not consume bones.
  • Damage from fire in cases of spontaneous human combustion is extremely localized. Delicate items close by the victim can remain unaffected. In one case a body was found incinerated in bed. Though the bed was destroyed, a box of tissues on the nightstand at arm's reach was untouched, along with the nightstand itself. In some cases plastic items nearby will melt, but the fire does not spread to envelop the room.
  • Burns to the body are deeply inconsistent. While the body and skeleton are reduced to ashes, the lower legs often remain, appearing as the victim might have casually placed them last, clothed and shod. In other cases a torso might be left, and in many cases the skull remains along with the lower legs.

Some believe spontaneous human combustion is a natural occurrence that is not yet understood. The scientific community rejects this notion out of hand, pointing to the body's water content and no known physical trigger for combustion. Many theories have been put forth in an effort to explain alleged spontaneous human combustion in other terms. The theory that has gained the most favor to date is the wick theory.

The wick theory charges that if clothing were to begin a slow burn, noxious fumes could render a person unconscious. From here, the low-flaming fire could spread over the body, melting body fat, which would soak the clothes, turning them into a virtual wick. While the "wick" slowly burned, the body fat would keep the fire alive. Eventually, when the entire body was consumed, the fire would go out. Proponents of this theory point out that this could account for the fire's containment. They also claim it explains why the lower legs are often left, as they have little fat content.

In an attempted trial to prove the hypotheses, wick theorists used a pig carcass to simulate the theory, but were forced to call in the Fire Department when the fire rapidly spread throughout the model. In another more successful trial where the bones finally became consumed, wick theorists claimed success. However, the pig carcass was soaked in petrol before setting it alight. There is no reported evidence of petrol or other accelerants in cases of alleged spontaneous human combustion.

Critics of the wick theory find many faults with it, arguing that it does not account for a source of ignition. Neither does it explain, in all cases, the deep inconsistencies in how the bodies burn. And in some cases empirical evidence appears to rule out a wick-type event.

There are people that claim to have survived spontaneous human combustion, and many have documented their experiences. It is unclear as to whether these incidences of partial burning represent spontaneous human combustion or another theoretical event called static fire. Static fire is believed to be generated by high levels of static electricity in the body. Under certain conditions it may be possible for static charge to create a spark that might ignite flammable clothing. There are several documented cases of witnesses to spontaneous fire which might be explained by static fire. Some wick theorists claim that static fire could be the source of ignition for a wick fire.

To date there is no unopposed theory for the phenomenon known as spontaneous human combustion. Less popular explanations range from paranormal causations to alleged nuclear fusion triggered by a hypothetical subatomic particle.

WiseGEEK is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon92633 — On Jun 29, 2010

I believe I know the dynamic in regard to the mystery of spontaneous human combustion.

It has to do with the mystical tradition of ascension.

ken r.

By anon90642 — On Jun 17, 2010

Being as this no longer seems to happen anymore, I have to wonder if it could have been associated with the development of the microwave transmitter/antenna systems used today. They are powerful enough to incinerate the human body without any damage to surrounding non organic material. As in the case of a microwave oven.

I was also watching an episode on the discovery channel, how the japanese, during the war were attempting to develop a microwave death ray. Now I would think if these occurrences were purely accidental, through the development experimental aiming practices at the time of the development of microwave transmitters and antennas, there would have been more partial burns of people realizing that they were being burned by something and moved out of the path of the fire. But in most cases the victims were in a prone position, sleeping at the time, making them perfect targets for a satellite transmitted microwave beam weapons test, where they could be killed by the beam before they could awaken and then be incinerated to ash where they lay.

Which any of these tests done by whomever would be kept completely top secret and passed off as spontaneous human combustion.

And we all know just how expendable human beings are to the organizations that would do these types of experiments. I have no idea if these were just random people chosen to be guinea pigs just because they were just in the wrong place at the right time, or if they were chosen because they knew more than someone wanted them to.

So in closing, this is merely a theory concluded by the obvious timetables, occurrences and circumstances involved. Just that that makes you raise an eyebrow and say hummmmm. I wonder.

By anon72248 — On Mar 22, 2010

it's possible that this could be some form of rapture. Look into the backgrounds of the people this has happened to, on their religious views and how they lived. by paul b., florida.

By anon61853 — On Jan 22, 2010

carbon-based life forms, and H2O in your body? i'm only 15 years old. did anyone else in the scientific community think of it like that? hydrocarbons reacting with oxygen in your body to form a combustion reaction?

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGEEK, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.